Home > Not Found > 0xe00084af - The Directory Or File Was Not Found, Or Could Not Be Accessed

0xe00084af - The Directory Or File Was Not Found, Or Could Not Be Accessed

Contents

Your question has triggered lots of discussion among BE engineers. Retention Period: Specifies the maximum length of time Backup Exec will retain media before it is automatically removed through the Data Lifecycle Management grooming process. is it that difficult to develop a pice ofsoftwarewitch can back up a the entire server to a set ofrotating usb disks? The first ("device1/pool1" etc.) is always connected to the BackupExec media server 24x7. this contact form

Second, we found the easiest way to determine dependencies is to attempt to delete the backup set (ALWAYS USING THE BE2012 GUI) that you feel should have already been deleted. The drawback of this design is potential disk performance degradation due to disk fragmentation. Hmmmm....Regards, Back to top #6 Guest__* Guest__* Guests Posted 26 March 2006 - 06:27 AM Foster, Suppose I did it via "Transfer Snapshots," for which I do have space, a little In this case, I'd like to go back and remove from a backup set on disk, all the files of type *.tmp, which presently consume about 780 MB and should not This Site

0xe00084af - The Directory Or File Was Not Found, Or Could Not Be Accessed

When the recatalog completes, one can create new backup jobs and select the destination. In Restore tab only one virtual machine is listed. Does this mean that backup sets that are expired will be groomed (that is, deleted from the backup media) within 4 hours of their expiry time even if there is no will DLM groom the expired last copy in the backup job chain if following modifications are made in the backup job?

In this way backup files do not get orphaned. Or - Create a New Folder and copy all the content from the old folder to the new one. Grooming Backup Set Backup Set failed, error -1101 (file/directory not found) Started by danv , Mar 21 2006 04:02 PM Please log in to reply 5 replies to this topic #1 V-79-57344-65033 This posts a real issue for customers today.

In 2010, after more than 10 years of service, I was recognized as a Distinguished Engineer. Sorry, we couldn't post your feedback right now, please try again later. Edited by glasnt, 30 October 2011 - 02:00 PM. http://osdir.com/ml/sysutils.retrospect.general/2008-08/msg00017.html Internet Dashboard Games Drivers Home & Personal Multimedia & Design iOS Tools MacUpdate Promo MacUpdate Desktop 6 MUMenu Add/Edit App Developers Company About Us Advertise Career Opportunities Support Privacy Policy Tools

We do not append backup set to a BKF file anymore. V-79-57344-33967 Sharepoint The second backup media is a USB drive ("device2/pool2") that is connected by staff at the start of each day Tuesday-Friday and taken home at the end of these days. I hope I answered your question. 0 Kudos point-blanc Level 4 ‎09-14-2012 07:30 AM Options Mark as Read Mark as New Bookmark Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content I was hoping that DLM would not groom until there was a low disk space event on that device, thus allowing as many old backups to be kept as disk space

V-79-57344-33967 - The Directory Or File Was Not Found, Or Could Not Be Accessed.

If there is no changes, nothing will be overwritten. https://www.veritas.com/support/en_US/article.TECH71644 Rebuilding (recreating) catalog file took 4 hours for a 300 GB backup set , but was successful, according to log. 0xe00084af - The Directory Or File Was Not Found, Or Could Not Be Accessed The problem is that I have multi-tape backup sets, and the first tape (DDS4) reads fine, and the second tape (DDS3) gets the errors listed below. (I grabbed the retro log Backup Exec Error Codes My area of focus has been on the development and design of the shared catalog components.

When viewing the job it can be seen that the job has actually duplicated the set as it should and can be seen in restore view and are fully restoreable   weblink The problem is that I have multi-tape backup sets, and the first tape (DDS4) reads fine, and the second tape (DDS3) gets the errors listed below. (I grabbed the retro log Did I misunderstand? USB, Firewire, SCSI, optical, what?Hardware RAID10 SATA drives, the newer machine has seperate RAID10 SAS for the OS drive; both machines are experiencing these issues, the older one more commonly (more 0xe00084af Backup Exec 2014

However the catalogue files will be created in the background. Google yields no results. 0 Kudos George_Dake N/A ‎08-03-2012 10:39 AM Options Mark as Read Mark as New Bookmark Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content ‎08-03-2012 10:39 AM It is possible that updates have been made to the original version after this document was translated and published. navigate here Using this method we were able to use Media Set retentions to keep as many backups on hand as possible.

For more information, see "VMware Data Recovery Integrity Check fails with the error: Trouble reading from destination volume, error -2241 (1018060)". Backup Exec Error Code E0008488 There are two backup destination media. At the very bottom here: http://www.roxio.com...win-family.html ) Back to top #9 glasnt glasnt Rookie Members 14 posts Posted 30 October 2011 - 01:52 PM I don't think that would help.How many

I have one backup set where the first member is DDS-3, and that one fails immediately. (same error) Is there some reason that Retro should have trouble with DDS-3 tapes?

Jump to content Windows | Mac | iPhone & iPad | Buy | Buy Try Upgrade Partners | Support Sign Thank you! Having said that, your description sounds like there may be other things that are controlling the dependency tree for the differentials that have nothing to do with the multiple B2D devices Catrebuildindex.exe -r From the system properties of the .bkf files: B2D003575.bkf Created: Saturday, June 23, 2012, 6:24:00 AM Modified Saturday, June 23, 2012, 6:39:57 AM B2D001089.bkf Created: Saturday, June 09, 2012, 5:12:33 AM

Is this patch avaiable? 0 Kudos David_Palmersto Level 4 ‎01-29-2013 03:03 PM Options Mark as Read Mark as New Bookmark Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content ‎01-29-2013 03:03 Tape). 0 Kudos muxonarization Level 3 ‎03-15-2012 06:20 AM Options Mark as Read Mark as New Bookmark Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content ‎03-15-2012 06:20 AM Your blog NOTE: The integrity check fails because the catalog files have just been deleted, that is an expected behavior. his comment is here Anytime.

We have already stored single GRT enabled backup (e.g. More Information Easy to use. No guarantee of backup data integrity for recovery. Stay tuned - I'm sure hoping for a solution to some of my DLM problems very sooooonnnn... 0 Kudos Philip_Christ Level 2 ‎04-04-2013 09:54 AM Options Mark as Read Mark as

from disk to tape). 0 Kudos Anker_Tsaur N/A ‎04-06-2012 01:56 PM Options Mark as Read Mark as New Bookmark Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content ‎04-06-2012 01:56 PM The solution with the pool works in theory, but has some disatvantisches in practis, i noticed. I've attempted to rebuild the >catalog file, etc and it is still occurring, has anyone successfully >recovered from this? > >Thanks, >-Drew >_______________________________________________ >Retro-Talk mailing list >List Address: [email protected] >Retro-Talk settings This included data that was backed up to .BKF container files (tape emulated disk container file) on disk or to tapes.

Is it usual in your experience to have to repair broken catalogs on a monthly basis?Also, do you know of any Performance Tuning documentation for Retrospect?Why do you have so many exchange) in its own image folder since BE 11.