I should mention at this point, everything was tested and signed off on the development servers and we created a particular mysqldump command to do the job. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. Post navigation SSIS: Read SQL Script files and Output to .csvfiles Don't Code Because YouCan Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here... So I tried dumping the table with mysqldump, and then rebuilding it from the dump. have a peek here
I can not repeat described behavior with test data. mysql> INSERT INTO `User` VALUES -> ('','','','fn14','user14','user14','ln14','',14,1,'','L','','E','2005-06 13 '> 22:32:47','2005-06-13 22:32:47','admin','admin'); Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql> Select * from User order by FName limit 0,10; +---------+-------+------+-------+--------+--------+-------+-------+---------+---------+-------+--------+-------+----------+---------------------+--------------------+------------+-------------+ | DefAcct PrimeBase XT is the first engine to take full advantage of this new feature in MySQL. FIX --- Before rebuilding a partition check whether non unique indexes are disabled on the partitons. http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?21,354376,354376
The part of application was working processing records but it was also moaning about database issue and not helpfully providing the same message as the database. Solution was to allow index reads on disabled indexes if there are no records. @ mysql-test/r/partition.result Bug#46639: 1030 (HY000): Got error 124 from storage engine on INSERT ... Return HA_ERR_END_OF_FILE instead of HA_ERR_WRONG_INDEX when there are no rows. [24 Aug 2009 7:18] Mattias Jonsson pushed into mysql-5.1-bugteam and mysql-pe [2 Sep 2009 16:42] Bugs System Pushed into 5.1.39 (revid:[email protected]) So, the text contains HTML tags.
Hope for only good things... Out of curiosity I did look at MySQL 4.1 artical and was surprised to find Bug #20357 made it all the way through to MySQL 5.1.12 & 5.1.31. In mysql 4, you could get away with some differences between the definition of the merge table and the underlying tables.As you've discovered, the structure and index definitions must now be Any Luck?ZTE ZMax Pro Phone?Spam?AlarmPad Pro Questions[camel-ftp] Can't Catch Invalid SFTP Port Exception About Faq Contact Us Qnalist.com
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. I'm getting the above error on insert to my database. As things goes there was a delay and the client continued with our original mysqldump command. https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=46639 Despite this error on insertion, the insert appears to complete successfully - my row count goes up, I can query against it (the actual table, and the merge table) and get
It has been closed. http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/218498 DISABLE KEYS, rebuilding any of its partitions enabled the indexes on those partitions, leading MyISAM to fail with an error when the optimizer tried to use one of the affected indexes. My queries are: 1. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above.
After the transferring, the table on B works well. navigate here SELECT ... Submitted: 10 Aug 2009 22:51 Modified: 16 Sep 2009 8:57 Reporter: Roel Van de Paar (OCA) Email Updates: Status: Closed Impact on me: None Category:MySQL Server: Partitions Severity:S1 (Critical) Version:5.1.36 OS:Any Bookmark the permalink.
Correct errno text is "Wrong index given to function". Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. I also tried to raise...MySQL University Session On October 15: The Spider Storage Engine in Mysql-generalcommunity team , [emailprotected] The Spider Storage Engine http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/The_Spider_Storage_Engine This Thursday (October 15th, 13:00 UTC), Giuseppe Check This Out Vikram A...Innodb Dealing With Blobs In 4.1: Error 139 From Storage Engine in Mysql-generalHi, with mysql 4.1, importing a dump of Innodb tables containing at least a blob field I invariably
That was when I got the call. If the first index is dropped, it works fine: mysql> ALTER TABLE met DROP INDEX `mid`; Query OK, 2 rows affected (0.11 sec) Records: 2 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql> INSERT The application engine was however, using the database and was happily processing new records. select * from rappresentanti NATURAL JOIN clienti; is the same as: select * from rappresentanti r JOIN client c ON r.cognome=c.cognome AND r.nome=c.nome AND r.vita=c.vita AND r.citta=c.citta AND r.prov=c.prov AND r.cap=c.cap
I couldn't repeat it yet, but just want to know if it's limited only to load data infile ... [10 Aug 2009 22:56] Roel Van de Paar Also see bug #46639 SELECT ... OS: Windows Server 2008 MySQL Version: 5.1.31 64bit Usage: Supports an application Vendor Support: No After migrating the application connections to the new hardware and fresh MySQL 5.1 server, the next this contact form Can be solved by either delaying the start_bulk_insert (see Bug#35845) or fallback on full partition scan (which in this specific case would not find any rows).
powered by phorum Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.